Concerning the Argument - as seen by a KJB-only proponent - that Referring to Jesus as Christ Does Not Refer to Him as Son of God, Which, Says that Proponent, is Necessary for Salvation
Concerning the Argument (as seen by a KJB-only proponent) that Referring to Jesus as Christ Does Not Refer to Him as Son of God, Which, Says that Proponent, is Necessary for Salvation According to 1 John 3:23 and 1 John 4:15
_________________________________
Yes, Master Jesus Christ is the Son of God. Not only that, but He is the only sired (begotten) Son of God. Not only that, but God sent Jesus Christ to Earth in the body. Still, salvation is by believing the 4 tenets of 1 Corinthians 15:3-8, according to 1 Corinthians 15:1-2 and by confessing Master Jesus, according to Romans 10:9a & 10:10b (and Romans 10:13).
Now, the same Jesus Christ who is Master is also the same Jesus Christ who is God's Son - that's not untrue just because salvation doctrine doesn't mention it, and it doesn't mean that I've been bewitched by anyone who preaches the same gospel that Paul also received and preached, by which we are saved, as long as our belief is not empty (in vain). The confession is the natural outcome of the belief.
The biblical detail you mentioned as being the Son of God is included in Paul's more general reference to Him as being Christ, of which reference Paul attaches (in Romans 10:4, 6, 7) to the same Jesus we call Master for salvation. Christ is God's Son (Matthew 16:16, Matthew 26:63, Luke 4:41).