Semantic Treachery - Changed Contexts - Premature Defense
We have heard so much language used in context of a single reaction that the same phrases (or some unique phrase that can be easily categorized by the commonly heard phrase) are always disbelieved, even in contexts where the common reaction is not intended but only straightforward declaration of the thing. Yet these phrases are not considered properly, due to our over-exposure to only one certain outcome out of many possible reactions to that phrase. For instance, when we say, "Now hold on. That's not the actual charge yet, but just the background", we find opportunity to rail and defend against that background so that the actual charge never comes. But the charge exists whether or not it's heard, and the presumed premature defense becomes a mere offense against hearing the charge.