Semantic Treachery - Changed Contexts - Premature Defense

We have heard so much language used in context of a single reaction that the same phrases (or some unique phrase that can be easily categorized by the commonly heard phrase) are always disbelieved, even in contexts where the common reaction is not intended but only straightforward declaration of the thing.  Yet these phrases are not considered properly, due to our over-exposure to only one certain outcome out of many possible reactions to that phrase.  For instance, when we say, "Now hold on.  That's not the actual charge yet, but just the background", we find opportunity to rail and defend against that background so that the actual charge never comes.  But the charge exists whether or not it's heard, and the presumed premature defense becomes a mere offense against hearing the charge.

Popular Posts

What the Church Should Know and Do

The Problem of Evil

Notes on Paw Creek Video about Heresy in TBN

Analysis for a Baby Christian - On Women Pastors

A Special Forces Demon Attack in a Dream

The Strange Meanness of Christians

Countering the Concept that the Bible Does Not Help with Everything in Modern Life

The Semantic Trickery in the 'Bring the War Home' Book Blurb

Track the Basis of Your Preaching Message, Dear Church - Psychology Based and Inverted Reading of Scripture

Answers about Gender Dysphoria