On the Destructive Lies Employed in Politics and School by Meaning-Manipulation Magic
Your Democratic opponents are skilled in magic. One form of magic in which they excel is the uncoupling of words and symbols from meaning and attaching them, without basis, to other meanings.
Consider watermelon. I like it - lots of humans do. But in a political environment, it may be bad form to serve watermelon at any function targeted toward people with black and brown skin, who've sadly already been boxed with a false-meaning label of 'race'. The serving of watermelon is seen as an insult through a false association, even when a more obvious and immediate association exists - this is where the magic gets strong - such as when the political activity takes place in an area well-known for superb watermelon or in an area that is historically associated with lots of watermelon at the time of year that the political activity takes place.
These false associations that are made through the careful decoupling and replacement of meaning from words and symbols, such as the presence and the gift of watermelon to a black person, is a powerful weapon when it's used against the majority of people who gather together and hear the words used in those false ways.
The procedure can be tempered such that the mass of people are instantly offended and defend themselves from being falsely grouped in with the replacement meaning, even to the point of instantly accusing the innocent wielder of the word or symbol as though they did mean the false thing. The procedure can also be tempered to give the unscrupulous speaker clearance as though they were just using the original meaning, even when the word or symbol is placed into an environment that suggests the false association. In this case, the speaker wants the hearers to create and accept the false association, but needs to keep the cover of the original meaning while programming the hearers with the false meaning. So, at the same time a very unfair thing emerges, that the wicked liar appears to be innocent even while arguing that an innocent thing carries a hurtful and a false meaning, which those who would employ the word or symbol to communicate the innocent meaning cannot do without a lot of explanations, yet those explanations are easily targeted by this meaning-perversion magic as wrongly-placed defense that evidences guilt of the one who was simply trying to talk - or share in God's wonderful bounty of watermelon. This causes double-mindedness in the victims of these lies.
Once the masses of people are trained to think a certain way, it becomes easy to couple the trick with mental partitioning for them to instantly make up their own false implications through falsely associating the innocent actions and words of others with the terrible things that lurk in their own false, double-minded, and walled-off thought processes.
It is a people-controlling attack when writ large across a nation. It is evidence of incompetence of care in those chosen to guard the well-being of others. Surely more than one are involved in its institution. Those carers are government personell and the cared-for are the citizenry.
This concerted heinous conspiracy must end. It's easy to ask for or to find the basis of the implication, and if it's not tied to reality, then there's a misunderstanding involved. We must all do our part to unwind the false associations in our own minds, which we have learned from our youth through mere televised programming. We must all be vigilant and demand those who even seem to purposefully be practicing this form of magical control to plainly explain why they make those associations when there is a more clear connection between words-or-symbols and meanings in evidence.
Another form of the problem is when the false association exists alongside the true one in the same context. In this case, we can set up the basis for a false conclusion - even one that happens later when we are casually experiencing the context again - by ignoring the true meaning. We must take care to think and to differentiate between the possible connects that true basis of the meaning in question.
Untangle these things. The experience of the purposeful application of this magic becomes pretty obvious with a little practice, but beware of assuming too much yourself about the character and nature of those you correct. Clarity of description is useful. Not all instances of implying a thing are wrong. The question is whether that implication has a basis that logically connects throughout the whole discourse. For instance, the definition of Evolution is change over time, but that doesn't mean we all came from a rock or that nothing exploded to make everything - it only means that we have observed that offspring are not entirely like either of their parents. So make sure that a defined term is used in the same way throughout, else perfectly observable microevolution might seem to become macroevolution without a basis in observed science, subverting the general concept of what it means to practice science by allowing the discontinuity between observation and conclusion, because we all know that science needs repeatably testable observations, yet here is analogical thinking instead, because "Evolution"!
In the end, it's all about the true meaning of those who communicate, whether they are not implying what you think they are or whether they are implying what you are meant to think they are not while they craft in you a mental model of some false implication or false conclusion - because they really are implying it in the background of your consciousness using carefully crafted placement, symbols and structures. When you see it happening - and especially when it happens often from an individual or from a group that has a common goal supported by the conveyance of meaning - remember that either intentionality or incompetence is evidenced in the public speaker and in the leader who has a job prerequisite of clear communication. If they don't want to be labelled a betrayer, then perhaps they are merely incompetent for any such job now and in the future. Ignore and replace them! Believe truth.